- From: Susan Lesch <lesch@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 01:47:17 -0700
- To: www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org
Hello, Twenty two people attended the 3 June 2002 Patent Policy Working Group (PPWG) teleconference. Four of the group's five new participants attended and gave introductions. The group then discussed patent discussions that took place at the semiannual W3C Advisory Committee Meeting that was held in May. One person suggested that the PPWG give new W3C-specific names to its proposed licensing options, as the commonly understood meanings of RAND and RF are not what is described, and hence introduce confusion. The group agreed. One person reported that at the AC Meeting, discussion focused on the Current Patent Practice Note, and asked whether the PPWG needs to produce anything more. The RAND task force gave a report on their RAND exception proposal that parallels the RF policy drafts. In this proposal, if RAND technology were introduced, Working Group participants would be required to license on RAND terms, and there would be no opt out for that Working Group's last published document. There was some discussion of the term "reasonable" with respect to free and open source software, and of the Patent Advisory Group (PAG) section of the current Working Group draft that would require Advisory Committee review and Director's decision when PAGs reach a conclusion. The group discussed preliminary logistics for their upcoming face to face meeting in July. The Chair gave a PPWG overview for new participants. The group agreed to meet next on 10 June. Best wishes, -- Susan Lesch http://www.w3.org/People/Lesch/ mailto:lesch@w3.org tel:+1.858.483.4819 World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/
Received on Tuesday, 11 June 2002 04:47:20 UTC