Monday, 1 October 2001
Sunday, 30 September 2001
Monday, 1 October 2001
Sunday, 30 September 2001
Monday, 1 October 2001
Sunday, 30 September 2001
Monday, 1 October 2001
Sunday, 30 September 2001
Monday, 1 October 2001
Sunday, 30 September 2001
Monday, 1 October 2001
Sunday, 30 September 2001
Monday, 1 October 2001
Sunday, 30 September 2001
Monday, 1 October 2001
Sunday, 30 September 2001
Saturday, 29 September 2001
Sunday, 30 September 2001
Saturday, 29 September 2001
Sunday, 30 September 2001
Saturday, 29 September 2001
Sunday, 30 September 2001
Monday, 1 October 2001
Sunday, 30 September 2001
Monday, 1 October 2001
Sunday, 30 September 2001
- RAND License acceptance Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
- W3C Patent Policy: W3C and the Promotion of Fee-based Standards for the Web Carl Spangenberger
- Patent Policy Chris Woodard
- Patent Policy Nicu Pavel
- Thanks A Lot, Folks Tim
- NO NO NO Fred T. Krogh
- I say "NO!" to RAND Richard E. Brown
- Patent policy Byron Como
- Patent Policy reed mideke
- One World, One Web, One Program......No W3C Greg T Hill
- Protest Iain Wilkie Logan
- Proposed Patent Policy Mike Keehan
- Proposed move to fee based standards David Stidolph
- Serious problems Rob Levin
- Patenting Standards David Clifton
- RAND Licencing ss@technicalpursuit.com
- W3C Patent Policy Framework John Jensen
- non-royalty-free licensing Chris Moller
- RAND Greer Pedoe
- LT: NO to RAND Proposal T.D.
- Patents and the W3C - NO ! Roy Carlson
- No patents as standards ... Albert A. Freeman
- Keep patented technologies out of W3C standards Michael Patrick
- RAND license is effectively impossible Stephen Drye
- Corporate Power Grabs Glenn Reynolds
- I implore you not to leave Opensource behind! Nathaniel Grady
- Crass Stupidity Chris Milton
- RAND -- "Whoops, you owe us royalties!" evan orensky
- What are you guys smoking? Rodrigo P. Gomez
- W3-patentpolicy Dennis Myers
- Nobility in Web Standards Joe Baker
- Effect on Mozilla etc Robert O'Callahan
- RAND Shawn Lindsay
- RAND W3C David Fries
- patents in your standards HILL, WILLIAM
- W3C Patents -----> Monopoly Control Robert Gadsdon
- Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users Rodent of Unusual Size
- patent policy prhodes@vdsinc.com
- Comment on RAND policy proposal Patrick Wiseman
- RAND? please just don't. Terje Kvernes
- "RAND" Kevin B. McCarty
- Patent policy Joyce Conklin
- How could W3C even THINK of such a thing? Lloyd Llewellyn
- apologies for posting twice by accident Dave Burstein
- Unquantifiable Liability ? An Objection to the Patent Proposal Stuart Ellis
- Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users Martin Hamilton
- NO Refuse
- "Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory" Keith Winstein
- RE: RAND Lars Forseth
- Opposed to RAND patents in W3C standards Glenn Randers-Pehrson
- Corporate product lines as "standards" Jesse Klug
- I don't like the RAND license Konrad Maquestieau
- W3C Patent Policy Framework Comment pawel@jerzy.prz.rzeszow.pl
- RAND and the W3C Patent Policy Thomas Worthington
- RAND policy Frank A. Love
- Policy vs. mechanism Tim Bray
- Please say NO to royalty-bound patents for the web! co1ethompson@netscape.net
- W3C betrayal of principles Rodent of Unusual Size
- No to Patents, Yes to Discrimination Sheryl Coe
- Implementing RAND would be the death of W3C H. Peter Anvin
- RAND licencing Meredydd
- FYI posting inspired by IP note Dave Burstein
- patentpolicy comment Martin Schlemmer
- Document contradicts own goals Dave Burstein
- Open Standards x Patents Alexandre Oliva
- Rand policies Nicolas Mailhot
- the promotion of fee base standards. florence
- This isn't necessary. I mean the W3C, that is. This patent hoopla raises legitimate issues about the viability of the W3C Joshua Prowse
- RAND Policy Kieran Hand
- I'm horrified. Shawn Quinn
- RAND Licensing Grant Robinson
- Very bad news Erik Sigra
- The patent-policy change (RAND) Stig E Sandoe
- What a joke you've become W3C. Darron Froese
- Comment on proposed "RAND" policy Stanley A. Klein
- Patent Policy Jeremy Beaumont
- Consideration of Patented Standards Cymen Vig
- RAND Licensing Model -- bad. kiss the sun and walk on air
- Strongly Opposed to W3C RAND patents Adam Logghe
- RAND Theo de Raadt
- This is not a good idea Joe Klemmer
- patent policy : chilling effect of RAND Bill Haneman
- RAND Justin H.
- Remember the browser wars? Now, apply RAND.. Asteris Masouras
- Patented technologies inclusion in W3C standards Lucas Bajrasz
- Turning out the light... Danny Goodman
- RAND licensing Christer O. Andersson
- Comments re: http://www.w3.org/2001/08/16-PP-FAQ.html Scott Hansohn
- You said it better than I can Mathieu Gervais
- [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> pbs
- RAND: Wrong! Jeff Trefftzs
- Patents can become an obstacle to free development/free world Francisco Rodrigo Escobedo Robles
- RAND John Helms
- Patent Policy Ben Reser
- RAND is bad for the Web Keith Dawson
- Patent policy Chris F.A. Johnson
- Please don't undo the good the W3C has achieved. Andrew A. Meier
- Royalty bound patents in web standards Steve Ball
- RAND is problematic Kevin Corlette
- W3C and the Promotion of Fee-based Standards for the Web John Mc
- and what about the penny-less student? Hereward Cooper
- W3C: why are you fighting against your old friends? Chessy
- Please do not allow RAND licenses Loren Guthrie
- Allowing Patents==bad Chris Carlin
- strongly opposed to W3C endorsing non-royalty-free standards Arthur A. Gleckler
- Royalty-Bound Patents in Web Standards Joe Votour
- I believe RAND is a bad idea Tobias Gloth
- No Web Patents! Mark Hinds
- W3C Patent Policy: Bad for W3C, bad for business, bad for users Tom Cooper
- Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users mcnill@talk21.com
- Comment to W3C Patent Policy Draft ferdinando.gallo@tin.it
- RAND considered harmful Tony Stieber
- W3C ridiculous new policy on patents Krux
- My opinion on the RAND proposal Ehsan Baseri
- Allowing patents in software standards is a mistake Curtis Galloway
- dangerous development Michel Koppelaar
- W3C patent policy Jerry Clabaugh
- Death of the W3C Max Dunn
- RAND: Friend or foe ? (or is w3c just abolishing themself) Niels Svennekjær
- Comment on patent policy Aaron Claessens
- comments on patented and proprietary "standards" Noah Hafner
- Re: W3C Patent Policy Framework David Leppik
- Royalties and the W3C Andrew M.A. Cater
- Concerns about future fees for already implemented standards. Tom Bryan
- EXCELLENT... Everything is falling into place! <HAHAHahahahaha....> flacco
- Please do NOT incorporate RAND licensed technology in your recommendations Glen Harman
- Opposed to proposed patent policy Stephen R. Savitzky
- oppose RAND cgalpin@lighthouse-software.com
- The Internet must remain free (gratis and libre) Eric Gerlach
- The Internet was developed for the Free exchange of Information - not big business s
- new royalty based standard Matt Greer
- Don't even think about it Eric W. Sink
- Re: the shift in the position of the W3C on patented standards. David D. Hagood
Saturday, 29 September 2001
Sunday, 30 September 2001
- RAND Policy Jonathan Hudson
- The policy change with respect to patents (RAND) Karl Trygve Kalleberg
- RAND licensing scheme Kisters
- Non-discriminatory licensing Anthony Taylor
- No to RAND license Wendell Schubert
- Patented standards == damage Keith Willoughby
- W3 Patent policy Scott Prive
- patent policy Pawel Krawczyk
- patentpolicy wchackett
- Patent Policy Jeff Rafter
- The proposal is very harmful mate@sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu
- NO Patents James Dornan
- RAND proposal Martin Wheeler
- Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users Ben Ford
- response to your proposal Franki
- W3C patent policy Peter Kelly
- Comment Michal Kochanowicz
- New patent policy Ken Arromdee
- The Internet: for citizens as well as commerce? julesa
- RAND licensing Jim Flynn
- It is so sad to see the W3C go David Waite
- No to RAND! Harry Zink
- NO to RAND Brent E. Edwards
- Do not allow "RAND" patents to pollute W3C standards Jamie McCrindle
- against patent-fees in w3c standards Thomas Strauss
- Concerns with implementing patented technology in W3C standard John Anderson
- Just say "no" to patents. Eric E. Coe
- MS attempt to kill Open Source projects Chris Worley
- do NOT allow non royalty free patents into W3C standards Kalle Näslund
- pateneted IP standards Archfeld Serethai
- W3C Patent Policy Gerhard Poul
- Re: RAND Licensing Concerns Neil Harris
- Please reconsider Karl Jackson
- Comment on RAND and RF type licencing Jeff Waller
- RAND licensing model Philip Kendall
- against reasonable licensing Billw3c@sorehands.com
- Reject RAND proposal Tom Epperly
- RAND Licensing is a terrible mistake Moore, Louis
- A comment on RAND... Carey Nation
- Comment on inclusion of patented technologies in standards: JUST SAY NO! Shawn Stamps
- comment Bruce Endries
- non-free standards Krzysztof Stańkowski
- Disturbing Zak McGregor
- RAND Patent Policy John Keiser
- No to RAND policy Mark Fasheh
- My vote is against Bartolomé Sintes Marco
- opposed to w3c patent-friendly policy Jim Wright
- opposed to non-free standards Donald Ball
- Patents Will Interfere With Existing Market-Driven Processes Eric D. Hendrickson
- Just say No to RAND! (and RF) David Brownell
- No patents, please! Matthijs Sypkens Smit
- Proposed changes to patent policy M Carling
- Proprietary standards. Rob Landley
- RAND license and the future of the web Antonio Larrosa Jiménez
- RAND only promotes big companies agenda Laurent 'case' Mahieux
- Patent Policy tres
- RAND is not acceptable Chris Fox
- RAND policy change David R. Dick
- RAND Concerns Darrell Parlee
- Patent Policy The Plumblys
- Proposed W3C Change on Patent Policy David Green
- comment Wolfram Tempel
- Patent Policy: bad for everybody except big biz warren
- simple analysis Thompson Hayner
- Proposed RAND Policy Alex Jacques
- Bad bad bad idea David Thede
- Redundancy of any comment Petter Sundlöf
- Backdoor attempt to banish Open-Source from the Web? Chris Rankin
- comment John D Griffith
- Patent Policy Julian Regel
- W3C Patent Policy Jerry Dennany
- Patented standard = oxymoron. A thousand times NO!!! Martijn Dekker
- FREEDOM! fumetor
- There is no need for this. John Nagle
- Re: [OT] W3C and the Promotion of Fee-based Standards for the Web Conan Callen
- RAND Would Destroy W3C Greg Smith
- Re: W3C Patent Policy: NO Timo <Blazko> Boewing
- No proprietary standards Alan Batie
- w3c accepting patented technology as standards Daniel McLaury
- Concerns regarding RAND licensing. Marcus Lauer
- I will have to look for other standard bodies Juergen Strobel
- RAND initiative User FWC
- Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users Bruce Krysiak
- Proposed patent policy destroys W3C mission nsmith@holycross.edu
- Disgust in proposed changes to W3C policy Graham TerMarsch
- Keep pay-for-play patents from the W3C C. Wegrzyn
- Against patents Ben Escoto
- Bad Idea Jeff Moe
- Comments Miguel Marcos
- please don't do it carlos
- new RAND licensing model comments Nicolas Ouedraogo
- W3C propsed patent policy Rodney Orpheus
- Yikes! Gary Kuever
- I object to RAND Jeremy Sanders
- Keep the standards patent-free H. Wade Minter
- no David Taté
- IMHO: Patents have no place in W3C Wally Trenholm
- Please do not encumber our standards with patents Jamie McCrindle
- W3C Patent Policy: NO Inaky Perez Gonzalez
- Patents & W3C standards David Eppstein
- Patents on W3C Standards Joe Brockmeier
- RAND Patents in Standards? NO! Barak Pearlmutter
- Patents in web standards Jon Forsberg
- Bad changes in policies Christophe Prud'homme
- The proposal about allowing patents on W3C standards would take away the value of these. Ram'on Garc'ia Fern'andez
- W3C Patent Policy Paul R. Ganci
- Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users D. Hugh Redelmeier
- W3C Patent Policy gricard@mac.com
- Please reconsider RAND patent policy... R. Douglas Barbieri
- Objection to RAND licencing scheme David Pye
- W3C: Thank you for RAND licensing policy! Chip Warden
- Patents in your standards James Briant
- patent policy David Magda
- RE: W3C Patent Policy Chavous P. Camp
- Re:%20Comment%20on%20Patent%20Policy&In-Reply-To=<20010930165427.IXMU14306.femail26.sdc1.sfba.home.com@there>&References=<20010930165427.IXMU14306.femail26.sdc1.sfba.home.com@there> Darren Schlamp
- W3C Patent Policy Framework Mike O'Regan
- RF and RAND licencing Dave Macmurchie
- Patent Policy Shawn Starr
- Please remember PNG, and do not allow RAND to become policy Joanne Hunter
- No to RAND David Wright
- I oppose RAND TQ White II
- Patent Policy Sara Yurman
- W3C - turning it's back on the reasons that the Internet has thrived? Toby Haynes
- Patent policy Artur Skura
- No to RAND!!!! Angelia Kane
- Patent Policy Framework w3ccomment@nickwillson.com
- Proposed W3C Patent Policy John Ripley
- The Patented Internet Ben Gamari
- I don't agree. Luke
- Patents only use if completely free and unrestricted Doug Blatherwick
- If it ain't broke... don't fix it. Clark C . Evans
- RAND Licenses Vincent Marcus
- Patent encumbered standards squelch innovation Ed Warnicke
- [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Christopher Hicks
- royalty free standards only, please Stanley Krute
- So much for an independant body Neil Watson
- Patents and standards are mutually exclusive Peter Holt Hoffman
- Advice to lengthen the time to respond to the RAND licencing issue Erick Staal
- RAND is Discriminatory. Ivan Fontaine
- No Patents Burt Betchart
- * "Standards" with licensing restrictions disasterous to free software * "Standards" with licensing restrictions disasterous to free software John McBride
- Patent policy comment Edward Avis
- Fee-Bound W3C Standards scottr
- AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL! Total Computer Solutions
- patents Thomas Zander
- RAND Dan
- Keep the web open Lee Bottemiller
- W3C Patent Policy Barry Dorrans
- The closing of open standards. Kent Rosenkoetter
- patented technologies in W3C standards Tom Swiss
Monday, 1 October 2001
Sunday, 30 September 2001
Monday, 1 October 2001
Sunday, 30 September 2001
Saturday, 29 September 2001
Sunday, 30 September 2001
Saturday, 29 September 2001
Sunday, 30 September 2001
Saturday, 29 September 2001
Friday, 28 September 2001
Thursday, 27 September 2001
Monday, 24 September 2001
Last message date: Sunday, 30 September 2001 23:57:46 UTC