- From: Lorrie Cranor <lorrie@research.att.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 11:17:27 -0500
- To: <www-p3p-public-comments@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Lorrie Cranor" <lorrie@research.att.com> To: "Erik Bergstr%F6m" <erik_bergstrom@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 11:16 AM Subject: Re: P3P Complexity > Using the APPEL language, a user would be able to > express such detailed preferences. It is not yet clear > which implementations will support this level of > flexibility, however. > > Regards, > > Lorrie Cranor > P3P Specification Working Group Chair > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Erik Bergstr%F6m" <erik_bergstrom@hotmail.com> > To: <www-p3p-public-comments@w3.org> > Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 11:11 AM > Subject: P3P Complexity > > > > Hello! > > > > I was just wondering how complex a users privacy preferences could be. > > I know that it is not up to the W3C to implement P3P in a user Agent, but > do > > you think the following preference will be able to be configured > > > > For example > > > > "Sheila has told her browser that she wants to be warned whenever the site > > asks for her email adress to be published in a public fora, unless she is > > going to be remedied whith money if a dispute occurs" > > > > Will a user be able to be that precise? If it is possible that will lead > to > > thousands of possible configurations. > > > > Excuse me for my bad english, i hope you understand what I mean > > > > /Erik Bergström, Örebro, Sweden > > _________________________________________________________________________ > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > > > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at > > http://profiles.msn.com. > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 7 November 2000 11:17:52 UTC