- From: Lorrie Cranor <lorrie@research.att.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:29:50 -0500
- To: "Martin J. Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>, <www-p3p-public-comments@w3.org>
Martin, Thanks for bringing these to our attention. We will try to address them in the next draft of the spec. Regards, Lorrie Cranor P3P Specification Working Group chair > Subject: 'we' in spec > > > The p3p spec contains several instances of 'we'. > > This should be avoided. > > > Subject: 'There are also other two P3P headers' > > > 'There are also other two P3P headers' > > > > (in 2.2.1) Besides the grammar problem, this is > > a presentation problem. All headers/all ways of > > referencing policies should be mentionned up front, > > e.g. in 2.1 or at the start of 2.2, and there > > should be a subtitle for each header. > > > Subject: 'it MUST NOT be used to maintain user browsing state' > > > 'it MUST NOT be used to maintain user browsing state': > > > > I don't understand this sentence in 2.2.1. How would this > > be done? > > > Subject: URI vs. URL > > > The spec contains one instance of 'URL', which should > > be changed to 'URI'. > > > Subject: capitalization of META,... > > > Capitalization of HTML element names should be changed to > > lower case, to be in accordance with XHTML. (section 2.2.2).
Received on Wednesday, 22 March 2000 10:30:34 UTC