W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-p3p-public-comments@w3.org > March 2000

response to several editorial issues raised by Martin Duerst

From: Lorrie Cranor <lorrie@research.att.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:29:50 -0500
Message-ID: <016d01bf9413$78583780$9816cf87@research.att.com>
To: "Martin J. Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>, <www-p3p-public-comments@w3.org>
Martin,

Thanks for bringing these to our attention. We will try
to address them in the next draft of the spec.

Regards,

Lorrie Cranor
P3P Specification Working Group chair

> Subject: 'we' in spec
> 
> > The p3p spec contains several instances of 'we'.
> > This should be avoided.
> 
> 
> Subject: 'There are also other two P3P headers'
> 
> > 'There are  also other two P3P headers'
> > 
> > (in 2.2.1) Besides the grammar problem, this is
> > a presentation problem. All headers/all ways of
> > referencing policies should be mentionned up front,
> > e.g. in 2.1 or at the start of 2.2, and there
> > should be a subtitle for each header.
> 
> 
> Subject: 'it MUST NOT be used to maintain user browsing state'
> 
> > 'it MUST NOT be used to maintain user browsing state':
> > 
> > I don't understand this sentence in 2.2.1. How would this
> > be done?
> 
> 
> Subject: URI vs. URL
> 
> > The spec contains one instance of 'URL', which should
> > be changed to 'URI'.
> 
> 
> Subject: capitalization of META,...
> 
> > Capitalization of HTML element names should be changed to
> > lower case, to be in accordance with XHTML. (section 2.2.2).
Received on Wednesday, 22 March 2000 10:30:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:42:59 UTC