- From: Mike Newman <newman.mike@btopenworld.com>
- Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 09:34:15 +0100
- To: <www-p3p-policy@w3.org>
Meta Tags - Regulation and Censorship Thread Can anyone shed some light on the following situation? I am a UK writer and adviser on "Internet Matters for Business" and I am presently researching a specific topic for publication. Briefly, the situation is this: a website has been published that, in the meta tag search section, contains an entry (say) "ACME ABC". The ACME company has complained to the ISP that the term "ACME ABC" is a registered trade mark and cannot be inserted into a meta tag. The ACME complainant did not object to "ACME ABC" being used in the general editorial content of the website. But only in the meta tag which it alleged was an infringement of its copyright. The ISP removed the website even though the term "ACME ABC" is contained in the editorial columns of hundreds of newspapers every day, and is generally promoted by the company as its popular name and is used as such in all its own corporate and marketing literature. However, the website owner then inserted ",ACME ABC PLC," into the search meta tag instead since it was not a registered trade mark. ACME again complained that even though "ACME ABC PLC" was not a registered trade mark, the full phrase contained "ACME ABC" which WAS a trade mark and once again alleged an infringement had been made! The ISP withdrew and banned the website totally and permanently. Could anyone advise me or even suggest where I might find authoritative information on any “laws” or Internet “conventions” governing the permitted or prohibited content of meta-tag search references (excluding decency and libel and suchlike? I am researching a business article on topics that include this particular aspect. newman.mike@btopenworld.com Mike Newman mipr UK Business Communications Consultant
Received on Sunday, 6 April 2003 04:46:31 UTC