- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 17:18:31 +0200
- To: www-p3p-policy@w3.org
I would note that the principle of finality and other OECD principles would be better respected with a more fine-grained approach. Lorrie described the risks of this approach. The benefit is a much more exact statement. Especially in Europe it wouldn't be the best idea to declare a very intrusive policy only because you want to avoid errors but you overdeclare massively. So imagine a car-seller gives you the terms and conditions for cars, trucks, busses, construction machines and would say: Hey, look into it yourself; some of that stuff might apply. You would run away from that dealer isn't it? For privacy this is not very different. Best, Rigo On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 09:41:01AM -0400, Lorrie Cranor wrote: > > There is no legal risk for erring on the side of thoroughness.
Received on Tuesday, 17 September 2002 11:30:07 UTC