- From: Lorrie Cranor <lorrie@research.att.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 08:23:45 -0400
- To: "Stephane Bortzmeyer" <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, "Graeme Eastman" <graeme@eastman.com.au>
- Cc: <www-p3p-policy@w3.org>
I hope in the future that we see search engines that allow users to specify privacy preferences and weight the results accordingly. I don't think it would give more weight to big corporate sites. Take a look at W3C's list of P3P-enabled sites http://www.w3.org/P3P/compliant_sites -- it includes lots of small companies, non-profits and individuals. You don't have to be a big company to P3P-enable. In fact, it's usually much easier for small sites to P3P-enable than it is for big companies. Lorrie ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephane Bortzmeyer" <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> To: "Graeme Eastman" <graeme@eastman.com.au> Cc: <www-p3p-policy@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 7:15 AM Subject: Re: p3p and search engines > > On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 06:41:04PM +0800, > Graeme Eastman <graeme@eastman.com.au> wrote > a message of 24 lines which said: > > > It would seem entirely logical to me that a search engine would give more > > weight to sites that had proper a privacy policy as it is more likely to be > > a current and responsible site, and therefore potentially more useful to a > > user. > > It could mean also that it is a site with more manpower. Giving a > higher ranking to P3P-enabled sites would favor big corporations over > small companies, not-for-profit societies and individual users. The > search engines already favor too much the Big Official Corporate > Sites. > >
Received on Thursday, 5 September 2002 08:25:34 UTC