- From: Lorrie Cranor <lorrie@research.att.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 09:17:41 -0400
- To: <tony.hogan@wachovia.com>, <www-p3p-policy@w3.org>
> I am now looking into P3P again and monitor this email distribution. > I am aware of IBM having a P3P tool, but the early version was very clunky. > Does anyone have an opinion on IBM's tool and/or their success in helping > organizations with P3P? Do you know of other entities that provide this > service? I like the IBM tool. It's not the easiest tool to use, but it is the most powerful P3P editor I've seen. Some of the tools that are easier to use have interfaces that are more like a questionaire. But they most of them don't offer the flexibility that the IBM tool offers. The recent versions are a lot better than the early versions, so you may want to take a look at it again. > Also, does anyone know of the top issues with P3P? For example, I > noticed a comment about Netscape not working with P3P? Even with IE being > the top browser, Netscape is still used by enough people to be considered > in the issues list. Netscape 7 now has P3P support similar to IE6. Lorrie -- Lorrie Faith Cranor - http://lorrie.cranor.org/ P3P Specification Working Group Chair - http://www.w3.org/p3p/ New book: Web Privacy with P3P - http://p3pbook.com/
Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2002 09:28:55 UTC