- From: Lorrie Cranor <lorrie@research.att.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 09:06:21 -0500
- To: "David Wall" <dwall@Yozons.com>, <www-p3p-policy@w3.org>
Let me correct some of this inaccurate information... > So, we have a vague "standard" that requires special tools for > administrators to even hope to build the P3P policy and compact headers > correctly, It doesn't *require* any special tools. And there are a number of tools that make this easier available for free. See http://www.w3.org/P3P/implementations > only IE6 implements it, not true, see also http://privacybird.com > Oh, for the days when standards were created after some experience in > practice (yes, the good old RFC days of the Internet) showing a valuable > protocol, workable solutions, with a reasonable level of adoption using a > proven technology.... Actually, P3P has not yet been formally "recommended" by W3C yet. We've had a stable spec for quite some time now and have put out public calls for implementations and feedback. At this point there has been a significant amount of implementation experience. Lorrie Cranor
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2002 09:07:31 UTC