- From: Speicher, Kevin <kevin.speicher@bgminteractive.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 09:36:44 -0500
- To: www-p3p-policy@w3.org
- Cc: "'Lennart Regebro'" <lennart@regebro.nu>
Lennart: We've found that IE version 6.0.2479 rejects third party cookies that IE version 6.0.2600 (and I) find totally acceptable. ________________ Kevin Speicher Director of Special Projects Bell Globemedia Interactive -----Original Message----- From: Lennart Regebro [mailto:lennart@regebro.nu] Sent: February 14, 2002 09:29 AM To: www-p3p-policy@w3.org Subject: Re: I need an example of a satisfactory policy for IE6 Thanks, I have now found it. It seems that the validator is very happy about having http-equiv headers, but IE6 is not. Which one of these implementations that are faulty I don't know, but one is doing things wrongly, thats clear. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lorrie Cranor" <lorrie@research.att.com> To: "Lennart Regebro" <lennart@regebro.nu>; <www-p3p-policy@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 3:02 PM Subject: Re: I need an example of a satisfactory policy for IE6 > Chances are that your CP is fine but your site is not actually > transmitting the CP with your cookie. Use the integrated > validation feature of the P3P validator to check. And click > on the headers link to see exactly what headers your > site is putting out. If you send me the URL in question > I would be happy to take a look at it for you. > > Lorrie > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Lennart Regebro" <lennart@regebro.nu> > To: <www-p3p-policy@w3.org> > Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 8:58 AM > Subject: Re: I need an example of a satisfactory policy for IE6 > > > > From: <rgrissom@lexmark.com> > > > You will have to pass a compact policy via the http request header to > have > > 3rd > > > party cookies validate via IE6. > > > > Yes, I know. > > > > Now I also have tried several compact policies that other people claim to > > work with IE6, and it's still a no-go. Any other common problems or hints > > would be appriciated. > > > > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2002 09:37:23 UTC