- From: Lorrie Cranor <lorrie@research.att.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 08:34:45 -0500
- To: "David Wall" <dwall@Yozons.com>, <www-p3p-policy@w3.org>
Actually, the first section of the policy summary for the red bird is the list of conflict items. In the case of the W3C site and the medium setting, I think you'll see there is only one conflict. Also note that the Privacy Bird does not have a default setting. When you installed it you had to select either high, medium, or low. After you install it there are many more options. Lorrie ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Wall" <dwall@Yozons.com> To: "Lorrie Cranor" <lorrie@research.att.com>; <www-p3p-policy@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 11:11 PM Subject: Re: AT&T birdware shows adoption problems... > > Try clicking on the bird and selecting the policy summary to > > find out what this means. And feel free to adjust the settings > > to something that makes more sense to you. > > Well, what would be nice is if the policy summary didn't show the entire > summary, but just the items that were in conflict and which of my checkboxes > caused the conflict. It's hard to tell what in the privacy policy is > actually showing the conflict with the settings I've chosen. > > Any my other point, lame as it might be, is that if a site like the w3c's > p3p page cannot even pass 'medium' (the default) privacy, what does this > mean to an end user? After all, it's not clear how that page has anything > to do with intruding into my privacy. It cannot identify me whatsoever. > What would be of concern at the w3c that it should be flagged as RED? > > David > >
Received on Friday, 8 February 2002 08:36:36 UTC