Re: LOC compact policy parameter

Mr. Grissom,

Sorry for confusing you. It is P3P validator's bug. 
It seems that I made a mistake when I updated the validator.
I fixed the bug, and the validator accepts "LOC" at this point.

Thank you for your contribution to the P3P activity.

    Regards,

-- 
Yuichi Koike ( koike@ay.jp.nec.com )
NEC Corporation.


> Anyone know why the LOC compact policy parameter no longer validates? I have
> been using the W3C validation services. I have replied to an earlier post in the
> IBM P3P editor forum that it appears that the W3C has possibly changed the P3P
> specs. This was discovered after previous policies validated and then didn't
> after a couple of weeks.
> 
> I am new to the list serv and hope this isn't something that has already been
> discussed if so my apologies.
> 
> Robert Grissom
> Senior Web Developer
> Lexmark International
> E-Business
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2002 10:36:31 UTC