- From: Lorrie Cranor <lorrie@research.att.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 08:57:43 -0500
- To: "'P3p-Policy'" <www-p3p-policy@w3.org>
We're doing our best to get a proposed recommendation ready ASAP. Barring any major problems, we expect to submit the PR to the W3C membership some time in January. Lorrie Cranor P3P Specification Working Group Chair ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Turner" <dt@od2.com> To: "'P3p-Policy'" <www-p3p-policy@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 3:54 AM Subject: Candidate Recomendation > Hya, > > We (On Demand Distribution PLC) have been trying to keep up to date > with the development of the P3P specification due to the majority of our > clients using Internet Explorer 6. We have had problems from our first > attempt to implement the specification, not really with it not working, > but being unable to get consistent results. However we now find > ourselves in a position where our setup is adequate and other than > generally keeping the "privacy" side of the platform up to date, we > planned to stop updating to the latest P3P specification, until final > agreement has been reached on what it will actually be. Therefore my > question is; is there any proposed timescale for a) movement to the next > stage of specification development (erm, Proposed Recommendation I > believe) b) for a final specification to be released. > > > I understand that development of a standard such as this is complex, > but the feeling here and amongst other Content Providers I have spoken > to in the UK is that whilst IE6 is not giving consistent results as > regards P3P, sites are using erroneous privacy statements to get around > problems and users are just setting there privacy setting to low. If > this goes on for a lot longer, I feel that the procedure for using P3P > will become more of an annoyance and switched off rather than widely > adopted and used, as we all hope for. > > Thanks > > Dave Turner > dt@od2.com > ----------- > Notice: All opinions expressed in this Email are my own and are no > reflection on the policies or opinions of On Demand Distribution PLC > (http://www.od2.com). > >
Received on Wednesday, 5 December 2001 08:58:15 UTC