- From: Martin Presler-Marshall <mpresler@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 08:50:50 -0400
- To: "Nikolaj Budzyn" <budzyn@ti.informatik.uni-kiel.de>
- Cc: <www-p3p-dev@w3.org>, <www-p3p-policy@w3.org>
Yes, it should be legal to have #user in a <DATA> element in a <STATEMENT>. Their categories would be determined by the bubble-up rule which I have put in the section 5.1 rewrite. -- Martin Martin Presler-Marshall - Program Manager, Privacy Technology E-mail: mpresler@us.ibm.com AIM: jhreingold Phone: (919) 254-7819 (tie-line 444-7819) Fax: (919) 254-6430 (tie-line 444-6430) "Nikolaj Budzyn" <budzyn@ti.informatik.uni-kiel.de>@w3.org on 08/27/2001 05:40:53 AM Please respond to "Nikolaj Budzyn" <budzyn@ti.informatik.uni-kiel.de> Sent by: www-p3p-policy-request@w3.org To: <www-p3p-dev@w3.org>, <www-p3p-policy@w3.org> cc: Subject: categories of data sets Hello, is it allowed to have "#user" or "#user.home-info.contact" as values of the ref attribute of a DATA element within a policy? If yes: In which categories are these? Why? (To know this is necessary for user agents providing category support, APPEL-compliant user agents, e.g.) If no: Aren't these data sets? Why/why not? What is a data set then? TIA and best regards, Nikolaj
Received on Monday, 27 August 2001 08:51:30 UTC