- From: Martin Presler-Marshall <mpresler@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 08:50:50 -0400
- To: "Nikolaj Budzyn" <budzyn@ti.informatik.uni-kiel.de>
- Cc: <www-p3p-dev@w3.org>, <www-p3p-policy@w3.org>
Yes, it should be legal to have #user in a <DATA> element in a
<STATEMENT>. Their categories would be determined by the bubble-up rule
which I have put in the section 5.1 rewrite.
-- Martin
Martin Presler-Marshall - Program Manager, Privacy Technology
E-mail: mpresler@us.ibm.com AIM: jhreingold
Phone: (919) 254-7819 (tie-line 444-7819) Fax: (919) 254-6430 (tie-line
444-6430)
"Nikolaj Budzyn" <budzyn@ti.informatik.uni-kiel.de>@w3.org on 08/27/2001
05:40:53 AM
Please respond to "Nikolaj Budzyn" <budzyn@ti.informatik.uni-kiel.de>
Sent by: www-p3p-policy-request@w3.org
To: <www-p3p-dev@w3.org>, <www-p3p-policy@w3.org>
cc:
Subject: categories of data sets
Hello,
is it allowed to have "#user" or "#user.home-info.contact" as
values of the ref attribute of a DATA element within a policy?
If yes: In which categories are these? Why?
(To know this is necessary for user agents providing category
support, APPEL-compliant user agents, e.g.)
If no: Aren't these data sets? Why/why not? What is a data set then?
TIA and best regards,
Nikolaj
Received on Monday, 27 August 2001 08:51:30 UTC