- From: Giles Hogben <giles.hogben@jrc.it>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:00:10 +0200
- To: "Lorrie Cranor" <lorrie@research.att.com>
- Cc: "p3pdev" <www-p3p-dev@w3.org>
Is there a place in the spec which says that the prf must be on the same site as the files it covers? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lorrie Cranor" <lorrie@research.att.com> To: "Giles Hogben" <giles.hogben@jrc.it>; "p3pdev" <www-p3p-dev@w3.org> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 3:52 PM Subject: Re: More sep spec qn's on pref > The images are not on busy's site, so they cannot be > covered by a prf on busy's site (except by the hint mechanism). > This would be the case regardless of whose privacy policy > applied to them. In this case the files are covered by busy's > policy, even though they are not on busy's site. But only > CDN can put up a prf that says this. > > Lorrie > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Giles Hogben" <giles.hogben@jrc.it> > To: "p3pdev" <www-p3p-dev@w3.org> > Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 9:45 AM > Subject: Fw: More sep spec qn's on pref > > > > In this example: > > > > "Busy's privacy policy applies to the images hosted by CDN, so Busy uses > the > > HINT element in its policy reference file to point to a suitable policy > > reference file at CDN, indicating that such images are covered by > > busy.example.com P3P policy." > > > > Why doesn't Busy just specify that the images are covered by > example.com's > > P3P policy in its own pref file, instead of using the hint mechanism? > > > > Thanks > > > > Giles Hogben > > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 28 September 2001 09:59:27 UTC