Fwd: EmotionML implementation report [update]

Dear W3C Multimodal Interaction Working Group,

Felix Burkhardt has informed us that there are some missing information about 2 Feature (241 and 212). 

Maybe my original email got lost (see below) in which I stated in the ALMA implementation report that these features are implemented.

Anyway, the two features are still implemented  and working in ALMA :-) ->

Feature 1: pass

Feature 2: pass

It would be nice to have a confirmation/feedback on my input.

Best
Patrick


-- 
Dr. Patrick Gebhard, Senior Researcher, patrick.gebhard@dfki.de
http://www.dfki.de/~gebhard, Phone: +49681 3023191, Fax: +49681 3025341
-- 
Official DFKI coordinates:
Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer Kuenstliche Intelligenz GmbH
Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
Geschaeftsfuehrung:
Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender)
Dr. Walter Olthoff
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes
Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313


Am 07.11.2013 um 12:50 schrieb <Felix.Burkhardt@telekom.de> <Felix.Burkhardt@telekom.de>:

> Dear implementers of EmotionML
> To make a long story short: Alexandre Denis of Loria did a thorough review and implementation of EmotionML and found several flaws that we managed to fix, now two issues are still open and we need to know from you whether your implementation supports two features, namely:
>> Feature1:
>>   In Section 2.4.1 of the sepc [1], there is a feature "The end value
>>   MUST be greater than or equal to the start value", which is not
>>   checked in the Implementation Report.
>> 
>> Feature2:
>>   In Section 2.1.2 of the spec [1], there is a feature "a typical use
>>   case is expected to be embedding an <emotion> into some other
>>   markup", which is not checked in the Implementation Report.
> 
> Please respond to this mail until 25th of November and state for both features whether it's "pass", "fail"  or "not-impl"
> Please send the answer to the public mailing list:
> www-multimodal@w3.org
> 
> EmotionML will then soon become a real recommendation!
> 
> Thanks a lot,
> Felix
> 
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Kazuyuki Ashimura [mailto:ashimura@w3.org]
>> Gesendet: Montag, 28. Oktober 2013 07:57
>> An: alexandre.denis@loria.fr; www-multimodal@w3.org
>> Cc: Burkhardt, Felix; Samuel.Cruz-Lara@loria.fr
>> Betreff: Re: AW: [EmotionML] implementation release and feedbacks
>> 
>> Dear Alexandre and EmotionML implementers,
>> 
>> Thank you very much for implementing EmotionML, Alexandre!
>> Also your thorough review on the EmotionML [1] specification and the
>> Implementation Report [2] is really appreciated.
>> 
>> We are very sorry it took much longer to get consensus about how to respond
>> to you and wrap-up the procedure [3] to publish EmotionML as a W3C
>> Recommendation.
>> 
>> We the W3C Multimodal Interaction Working Group have already fixed typos
>> in the spec and added necessary clarifications to it.  In addition, we have
>> generated an updated version of the schema [5, 6].
>> 
>> Now the remaining question is how to deal with your comments on the
>> Implementation Report which wouldn't change the spec itself.
>> 
>> I talked within the W3C Team about what we should have done from the W3C
>> Process viewpoint, and it seems we need to make sure that there are enough
>> implementation experience for the following two features which were not
>> explicitly described in the published Implementation Report [2].
>> 
>> Feature1:
>>   In Section 2.4.1 of the sepc [1], there is a feature "The end value
>>   MUST be greater than or equal to the start value", which is not
>>   checked in the Implementation Report.
>> 
>> Feature2:
>>   In Section 2.1.2 of the spec [1], there is a feature "a typical use
>>   case is expected to be embedding an <emotion> into some other
>>   markup", which is not checked in the Implementation Report.
>> 
>> We have already checked with EmotionML implementers (including you) and
>> it seems we can get several implementations for the above two features as
>> well.
>> 
>> Now we would like to ask all the EmotionML implementers to respond to this
>> message and express if the aobve features are implmented so that we can
>> finalize the procedure and publish EmotionML as a W3C Recommendation.
>> 
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/PR-emotionml-20130416/
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/mmi/2013/emotionml-ir/
>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/tr.html#maturity-levels
>> [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-multimodal/2013May/0000.html
>> [5] http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/PR-emotionml-20130416/emotionml.xsd
>> [6] http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/PR-emotionml-20130416/emotionml-
>> fragments.xsd
>> 
>> Sincerely,
>> 
>> Kazuyuki Ashimura;
>> for the W3C Multimodal Interaction Working Group


Anfang der weitergeleiteten Nachricht:

> Von: Patrick Gebhard <patrick.gebhard@dfki.de>
> Betreff: EmotionML implementation report [update]
> Datum: 24. Oktober 2012 15:53:46 MESZ
> An: "www-multimodal@w3.org" <www-multimodal@w3.org>
> Kopie: "Felix.Burkhardt@telekom.de Burkhardt" <Felix.Burkhardt@telekom.de>
> 
> Dear W3C Multimodal Interaction Working Group,
> 
> I've put some meaningful explanation in the testimonial element description of my last implementation report for the ALMA.
> Please consider the attached version as the current version.
> 
> Best regards
> Patrick Gebhard
> 
> --
> Dr. Patrick Gebhard, Senior Researcher, patrick.gebhard@dfki.de<mailto:patrick.gebhard@dfki.de>
> http://www.dfki.de/~gebhard, Phone: +49681 3023191, Fax: +49681 3025341
> --
> Official DFKI coordinates:
> Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer Kuenstliche Intelligenz GmbH
> Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
> Geschaeftsfuehrung:
> Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender)
> Dr. Walter Olthoff
> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes
> Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313
>