- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 03:22:10 +0200
- To: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Cc: ietf-types@iana.org, ietf-xml-mime@imc.org, www-multimodal@w3.org
* Kazuyuki Ashimura wrote: >W3C has just published a Candidate Recommendation for "Emotion Markup >Language (EmotionML)" at: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-emotionml-20120510/ > >I am sending this request to ask the Ietf-types list for comments on >the Media Type section of the EmotionML specification following the >procedure defined at: > > http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype The procedure requires Working Groups to ask for ietf-types review when making a Last Call announcement. I have not been able to find any such request in the archive. If the Working Group failed to follow the pro- cedure, it would be helpful if you could put that on the record. >MIME media type name: >--------------------- > application This is using an outdated template. The current one is in RFC 4288. In it, some field names are different and some fields are organized in a different manner. >Optional parameters: >-------------------- > charset > > This parameter has identical semantics to the charset parameter >of the application/xml media type as specified in [RFC3023] or its >successor. > >Encoding considerations: >------------------------ > By virtue of EmotionML content being XML, it has the same >considerations when sent as "application/emotionml+xml" as does XML. See >RFC 3023 (or its successor), section 3.2. RFC 3023 has boilerplate for this, but the above seems close enough. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Friday, 11 May 2012 01:22:41 UTC