Re: [arch] confidental flag

Hi Dirk,
We've discussed your question about the confidential flag in the Working
Group. Our intention was that the exact interpretation of the confidential
flag would be implementation-specific. However, it's also worth pointing out
that this feature was called out as "at risk" in the Candidate
Recommendation spec, due to a potential lack of implementations. If we don't
get two implementations of this feature it will be removed from the spec.
Since we are tracking all comment threads at this point, please let us know
by June 15 if this resolution is acceptable, otherwise we will assume that
you agree with our decision (but it is very helpful to have an explicit
response).
Best regards,
Debbie Dahl, MMI WG Chair