AW: EmotionML namespace prefix

• From: <Felix.Burkhardt@telekom.de>
• Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 10:06:45 +0200
• To: <gerhard.fobe@s2009.tu-chemnitz.de>, <www-multimodal@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <05C81A773E48DD49B181B04BA21A342A27C44610E3@HE113484.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>

Hi Gerhard
The MMI Working Group has discussed your point and agrees with you that the prefix should be kept consistent in the spec and that "emo" is a good choice, so we'll change the spec accordingly.

Thanks again for your comments. Please let us know before August 15 whether or not you accept this proposal.

Best regards,
Felix Burkhardt

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Gerhard Fobe [mailto:gerhard.fobe@s2009.tu-chemnitz.de] 
Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. August 2012 23:11
An: www-multimodal@w3.org
Betreff: EmotionML namespace prefix

Hello,

I note an inconsistence using namespace prefixes in examples of EmotionML. In example of section 2.1.1 (<emotionml>) there is em: as prefix for EmotionML. In the example in section 5.2.2 (SSML) and in Appendix A (XML Schema) emo: is used as prefix. What is the recommended prefix? I think emo: is the most intuitive choise.

Best regards

Gerhard Fobe

Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2012 08:08:57 UTC