Re: [emo] Response to your comment on the W3C EmotionML LCWD (ISSUE-175)

On 31 May 2011, at 00:56, Marc Schroeder wrote:

> Do you agree this is a reasonable choice, or do you have some other thoughts on this matter?

No - it is disappointing to see W3C has no consistent mechanism to define a Vocabulary - something that is so fundamental and basic to the (semantic) web.

Each WG does it their own way. Did W3C say interoperability ;-)


Cheers...

Renato Iannella
Semantic Identity
http://semanticidentity.com
Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206

Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 06:00:28 UTC