W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-multimodal@w3.org > June 2011

Re: [emo] Response to your comment on the W3C EmotionML LCWD (ISSUE-175)

From: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:59:54 +1000
Cc: www-multimodal@w3.org, w3c-mmi-wg <w3c-mmi-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <9E93FF8C-26F4-4EC6-9F7E-1F355BE84311@semanticidentity.com>
To: Marc Schroeder <marc.schroeder@dfki.de>

On 31 May 2011, at 00:56, Marc Schroeder wrote:

> Do you agree this is a reasonable choice, or do you have some other thoughts on this matter?

No - it is disappointing to see W3C has no consistent mechanism to define a Vocabulary - something that is so fundamental and basic to the (semantic) web.

Each WG does it their own way. Did W3C say interoperability ;-)


Cheers...

Renato Iannella
Semantic Identity
http://semanticidentity.com
Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 06:00:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:06:36 UTC