- From: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 21:07:51 -0500
- To: www-multimodal@w3.org
Reference: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-InkML-20061023 Your solid geometry was doing fine in defining the pen attitude coordinates until you came to pen rotation. <quote cite=""> Figure 3b shows the Rotation of the pen along its longitudinal axis. </quote> There needs to be a definition of what the orientation of the pen is when this coordinate is zero; the origin of the angular measure that gets reported. One possible definition is as follows: The departure of a reference mark or meridian on the pen barrel from the nominal 'up' direction which may be constructed by a ray perpendicular to the pen barrel (somewhere not at the tip) and intersecting a pure-Z ray arising from the tip. This angle is measured in a clockwise direction when viewing the pen barrel from tail to tip, in degrees. This definition would relate well to the force distribution across the two sides of a fountain pen nib. A different way to identify the nominal 'up' direction would be the plane passing through the pen barrel and a pure-Y ray passing through the tip. Here the 'up' direction is a direction that has negative correlation with the Y axis, which normally flows down. This definition would relate well to the use of an x-acto art knife, indictating the user's intent as to whether the next bit of the trace should be increasing or decreasing in X coordinate. Each of these example definitions is just a quick blurt; you can say it more simply but you have to say something more than you have said. Al
Received on Tuesday, 19 December 2006 02:08:49 UTC