- From: Dale Gonzalez <dale.gonzalez@air2web.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:34:52 -0400
- To: <public-ddwg@w3.org>, <www-mobile@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2005 13:38:09 UTC
Seems to me that using user-agent/connect info is better than IMEI. IMEI is tied directly to the hardware. As the devices become more and more advanced, the client that the user is using - which is the thing that must be adapted to - will be downloadable and only have a passing association with the hardware. Or am I missing something. ________________________________ From: www-mobile-request@w3.org [mailto:www-mobile-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Luca Passani Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 3:13 AM To: public-ddwg@w3.org; www-mobile@w3.org Subject: RE: Mobile phone capabilities list? I was told offline that IMEI is only GSM and CDMA too. Quite frankly, I still don't see why we should give up on such a powerful unique key to device capabilities, but it explains why "purists" don't like the idea :-) Of course, I will consider seriously the creation of the IMEI module for WURFL in the months to come. Is there any operator willing to put some money there? Luca
Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2005 13:38:09 UTC