- From: Luu Tran <Luu.Tran@Sun.COM>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 12:28:21 -0800
- To: "J.J.SOLARI" <jjsolari@pobox.com>
- Cc: www-mobile@w3.org
Thanks for these comments. I agree with both of your suggestions and will work with the DIWG to update the errata page: http://www.w3.org/2003/07/ccpp-SV-PR/errata/ Luu J.J.SOLARI wrote: > Hello all, > > When translating REC CC/PP, I noticed these typos: > > ============ > <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-CCPP-struct-vocab-20040115/#xtocid- > 33666557> > > Headings differ in summary: > > Appendix B.2 Structural properties (instances of ccpp:Property) > > and in text: > > Structural properties (instances of ccpp:Structure) > > From the RDF Schema, I read that: > "...ccpp:Property is a super-class for ccpp:Structure and > ccpp:Attribute..." > and further that: > "All properties that are structural elements of a CC/PP profile > are defined as instances of ccpp:Structure. This allows > structural combining elements of a profile to be distinguished > from attributes in a schema-aware environment." > > My understanding is that the heading should read: > Structural properties (instances of **ccpp:Structure**) > > =========== > <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-CCPP-struct-vocab-20040115/#3.3.3> > > In Appendix D.3.3 Interpretation not dependent on other attribute > values, first paragraph, the sentence: > > ... E.g. an attribute called, say, *page-width* ... > > It is said in section D.3.4 just below, that, as a convention, the > initial letters of words composing an attribute name, except the first > word, should be capitalized. > > So, for consistency, it should read: > ... E.g. an attribute called, say, *pageWidth* ... > > ============ > > To whom it may concern, > > hih, > > JJS. >
Received on Monday, 26 January 2004 15:31:00 UTC