Re: Content Negotiation and Adaptation, Why and How .. ?

> Two questions arise here:
> 
> 1) How can content servers achieve the acquisition of a complete image
> of the characteristics of clients, documents, network, etc.?

I don't know that "complete" is a necessary goal for what you want to
achieve.  Certainly, there would definitely be some minimum amount of
information that a server or intermediary would need to have in order to
do a reasonable job.  But in between those two extremes, there's useful
adaptation happening.  And the more information that is available, the
better that adaptation will be.

> 2) How can we apply the matching of all these descriptions in order to
> end with an adapted service or content that meet after all the user
> preferences and capabilities. ?

Without plugging my company's products too hard, I like to think that
application routing is a perfect tool for this task.  Using some
basic routing primitives, one can compose local filtering rules into a
routing mesh that implements the composite of all those rules.

For example, you might have the following local rules which you declare
independantly;

- WML content gets translated to XHTML Basic
- English content gets translated to French

The resultant mesh would take any English WML and produce French XHTML
Basic.  Other rules can added incrementally while preserving the
integrity of the existing rules.

MB
-- 
Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc.
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.      mbaker@planetfred.com
http://www.markbaker.ca   http://www.planetfred.com

Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2002 23:20:28 UTC