www-mobile@w3.org from June 2002 by date

Thursday, 27 June 2002

• ＊。。連鎖超商邀你加盟。。＊ kk@w3.org
• RE: Issues and future work for CC/PP Keskar, Dhananjay V

Monday, 24 June 2002

• RE: Issues and future work for CC/PP Butler, Mark

Sunday, 23 June 2002

• FW: [Moderator Action] RE: Issues and future work for CC/PP Kazuhiro Kitagawa

Friday, 21 June 2002

• RE: Issues and future work for CC/PP Keskar, Dhananjay V
• RE: Issues and future work for CC/PP Erich Izdepski
• FW: [Moderator Action] Re: Issues and future work for CC/PP Kazuhiro Kitagawa
• RE: Issues and future work for CC/PP Butler, Mark
• FW: [Moderator Action] Re: Issues and future work for CC/PP Kazuhiro Kitagawa
• Forward: [Moderator Action] Re: Issues and future work for CC/PP Kazuhiro Kitagawa
• Forward: [Moderator Action] ACM MSWiM'2002 Call for Papers Kazuhiro Kitagawa

Thursday, 20 June 2002

• Forward: [Moderator Action] CFP: 5th ACM Workshop on Wireless Mobile Multimedia (WoWMoM2002), papers due: June 25, 2002 Kazuhiro Kitagawa

Wednesday, 19 June 2002

• RE: CC/PP, RDF and XML Keskar, Dhananjay V
• Re: Issues and future work for CC/PP Andreas Schade
• RE: CC/PP, RDF and XML Patrik Osbakk
• Re: CC/PP, RDF and XML Steve Geach

Tuesday, 18 June 2002

• CC/PP, RDF and XML Butler, Mark

Monday, 17 June 2002

• 超值雙組合=駭客技術加新名單 B2m5iSnedKEzdqz5VMp76Ax9maNm ezgo@w3.org

Thursday, 13 June 2002

• Issues and future work for CC/PP Butler, Mark

Tuesday, 11 June 2002

• RE: Why RDF was a good choice luc.pezet@club-internet.fr
• RE: Why RDF was a good choice Tayeb Lemlouma
• Re: Why RDF was a good choice Carl Binding
• RE: Why RDF was a good choice Vidhya Gholkar

Monday, 10 June 2002

• RE: Why RDF was a good choice Butler, Mark
• Re: Why RDF was a good choice Sam Lerouge

Sunday, 9 June 2002

• RE: HTTP request simulator Vidhya Gholkar
• RE: HTTP request simulator Stan@rga.com

Saturday, 8 June 2002

• Re: Why RDF was a good choice Carl Binding

Friday, 7 June 2002

• Re: CC/PP, RDF, DAML and Knowledge Representation (clarification) Graham Klyne
• Re: CC/PP, RDF, DAML and Knowledge Representation Graham Klyne
• CC/PP, RDF, DAML and Knowledge Representation Butler, Mark
• Re: Validation in CC/PP Andreas Schade
• unregister Paul McMaster

Thursday, 6 June 2002

• unregister emateos@telecable.es
• RE: unregister Art.Barstow@nokia.com
• unregister LAISE Antonello
• unregister Natal Tello, Angel
• unregister Guillaume OSTER
• unregister Scott Morrison
• RE: Validation in CC/PP franklin.reynolds@nokia.com
• Re: DAML/RDF and CC/PP (Was -- Re: Validation in CC/PP) Ron Lake
• Why RDF was a good choice Sam Lerouge
• unregister Marcelo Milrad
• DAML/RDF and CC/PP (Was -- Re: Validation in CC/PP) Anupam Joshi
• RE: Validation in CC/PP Graham Klyne
• Re: Validation in CC/PP Tayeb Lemlouma
• RE: Validation in CC/PP Butler, Mark
• unregister Abhishek Tyagi
• Re: Validation in CC/PP Tayeb Lemlouma
• unregister Manan Panchal
• RE: Validation in CC/PP Butler, Mark
• unregister Ben-Zvi, Ron
• Forward: Globalization in Device Independence Kazuhiro Kitagawa
• Re: Validation in CC/PP Carl Binding

Wednesday, 5 June 2002

• RE: Validation in CC/PP Art.Barstow@nokia.com
• Validation in CC/PP Butler, Mark

Tuesday, 4 June 2002

• RE: HTTP request simulator Keskar, Dhananjay V
• Re: HTTP request simulator Tayeb Lemlouma

Last message date: Thursday, 27 June 2002 18:35:12 UTC