Re: Review WAP 2.0 Arch. specs.

Why should there be only one document? It would surprise me very much if
all the reviewers had the same opinion.

By the way, that document can not represent anyones opinon but the
reveiwers. There is no process for it.

Johan

Kazuhiro Kitagawa wrote:

> Hello,
>
> We have several volunteers who are willing to review WAP 2.0
> arch specs.  let's start reviewing and send your comments to
> www-mobile@w3.org
>
> By the way, I would like to ask someone to be the editor
> of the review document. The editor should be a member of W3C,
> and management and organize the review comments.  Mostly,
> it may not be hard work, I think.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> -kaz
> --
> Kazuhiro Kitagawa W3C DI Activity lead & Mobile IG staff contact

--
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  Johan Hjelm, Senior Specialist
     Ericsson Research Japan

  Read more about my recent book
http://www.wireless-information.net
************************************