- From: Johan Hjelm <hjelm@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2000 09:15:09 -0500
- To: Takuya ASADA <asada@w3.org>
- Cc: www-mobile@w3.org
Hi Simon, as chair of the WG, I would like to have more detailed comments. What do you consider overdesigned, and why? Do you have suggestions for alternative mechanisms? If you can make capabilities negotiation simpler without creating a separate protocol, I would like to hear how. Johan At 16:54 2000-03-07 +0900, Takuya ASADA wrote: >Rejected mail. Please confirm your From address before you send >any message to the list. >Return-Path: <www-mobile-request@w3.org> >Received: from tux.w3.org (IDENT:root@tux.w3.org [18.29.0.27]) > by sh.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp (8.9.3/3.7W) with ESMTP id JAA20803 > for <asada@w3.mag.keio.ac.jp>; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 09:54:19 +0900 (JST) >Received: from www19.w3.org (www19.w3.org [18.29.0.19]) > by tux.w3.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA31482 > for <asada@w3.org>; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 19:54:18 -0500 >Received: by www19.w3.org (8.9.0/8.9.0) id TAA20306 > for asada@w3.org; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 19:54:18 -0500 (EST) >Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 19:54:18 -0500 (EST) >X-Envelope-From: www-mobile-request@tux.w3.org Mon Mar 6 19:54:16 2000 >Received: from tux.w3.org (tux.w3.org [18.29.0.27]) > by www19.w3.org (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id TAA20286 > for <www-mobile@www19.w3.org>; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 19:54:16 -0500 (EST) >Received: from hesketh.net (wasabi-eth0-1.hesketh.net [216.27.10.31]) > by tux.w3.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA31479 > for <www-mobile@w3.org>; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 19:54:15 -0500 >Received: from thinkpad (ith1-1ac.twcny.rr.com [24.92.236.172]) > by hesketh.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA15605 > for <www-mobile@w3.org>; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 19:54:03 -0500 >Message-Id: <200003070054.TAA15605@hesketh.net> >X-Received-From: simonstl@simonstl.com >X-Delivered-To: <www-mobile@w3.org> >X-Sender: simonstl@216.27.10.33 >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0.1 >Old-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 19:54:51 -0500 >To: www-mobile@w3.org >From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> >Mime-Version: 1.0 >X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list >Subject: [Moderator Action] Fwd: what's wrong with CC/PP >X-Diagnostic: Mail coming from a daemon, ignored >X-Envelope-To: www-mobile >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >Content-Length: 1665 > >I just sent this to XML-Dev (which has been discussing "What's wrong with >SVG" of late, hence the title.) > >I'm deeply concerned that CC/PP is both a critical component and radically >overdesigned. > >>Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 19:52:04 -0500 >>To: XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@xml.org> >>From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> >>Subject: what's wrong with CC/PP >> >>As long as we're talking about controversial design choices... >> >>The latest draft of Composite Capabilities/Preference Profiles (CC/PP) has >me really wondering. (http://www.w3.org/TR/CCPP-ra) CC/PP is a critical >part of making XHTML and other XML vocabularies easily exchangeable, >allowing clients, servers, and other participants to describe their >capabilities. >> >>Over a year since RDF Schemas went into Proposed Recommendation status, >apparently never to return, this critical spec-in-progress announces that >it plans to define its vocabulary items in RDF Schemas. >> >>RDF Schema isn't the only W3C spec referenced here - P3P, digital >signatures and XML all pop up, along with WAI, and of course HTTP - but it >seems like this is some really critical work to be building on foundations >that aren't nearly stable (or, from some perspectives, even likable) yet. >WAP and the IETF CONNEG work are also referenced. >> >>The "Executive Summary of Requirements" notes "Flexibility, extensibility, >and distribution," but appears to have entirely forgotten simplicity. >> >>Yikes! Is it too late to derail this train? >> >Simon St.Laurent >XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. >Building XML Applications >Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical >Cookies / Sharing Bandwidth >http://www.simonstl.com > ************************************************************ Johan HJELM Ericsson Research, User Applications Group Currently visiting engineer at the W3C Chair, CC/PP Working Group and WCA Interest Group The World Wide Web Consortium hjelm@w3.org http://www.w3.org/People/W3Cpeople.html#Hjelm Fax +1-617-258 5999, Phone +1-617-253-9630 MIT/LCS, 545 Tech. Sq. Cambridge MA 02139 USA Opinions are personal, always my own, and not necessarily those of Ericsson or the W3C. ============================================================
Received on Tuesday, 7 March 2000 09:17:25 UTC