- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 09:38:33 +0100 (BST)
- To: devlinh@nwu.edu
- CC: www-math@w3.org
> It is an error to enclose a relation in an element other than reln. > But the example immediately following and some earlier examples show relns > inside applys. but a `reln' is not a `relation element' according to the text of the spec. So you are supposed to use <reln/> to apply <lt/> to two values, but if you want to combine two such relations with <and/> then you need to <apply/> <and/>. The plan is that this situation will be improved in MathML2, although the details are not finalised. The current best guess is that the restriction on not using <apply/> with `relation' elements will be dropped and so you will be able to uniformly use <apply/> (with reln being kept for largely historical reasons). David
Received on Thursday, 28 October 1999 04:42:39 UTC