Re: please read before our meeting...

Hi all,

@Moritz: did you read through until the end of 5.2? The copy-editing at the
end has a couple of broken sentences.
That is in a way a good reflection of how the PR discussion about that
fragment went.

The break in reading here: "then it is treated as Unknown concept names
should be read as a literal"
is something to be cleaned before discussing. I'll try to file a PR for
Neil today if he doesn't beat me to it.

Greetings,
Deyan


On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 12:09 AM Neil Soiffer <soiffer@alum.mit.edu> wrote:

> 5.2 Intent Concept Dictionaries
> <https://w3c.github.io/mathml/#mixing_intent_dictionaries> in the MathML
> spec had a PR that had lingered for a year. Bruce, David, Deyan, and I had
> extensive discussions over the last few days about how it should be
> rewritten so that AT developers know what they should and what they are
> free to do. I have committed something that we can discuss at our Thursday
> meeting. The section is about 1.5 pages long, so it won't take too long to
> read, but is long enough that it is a waste of time to read at the meeting.
>
> Please read it before the meeting and take note of what may be confusing
> or what may be missing or wrong or differs from your expectations.
>
> I'm looking forward to hearing what people think.
>
>     Neil
>
>