Re: Minutes: MathML TPAC meeting, 14 Sept, 2023

My guess is that the type of XML I showed at TUG 2014 (in Portland, Oregon), which is both well-structured -- all math expressions are XML trees -- and close to LaTeX, might be better than content MathML for generating Braille or voice.  (I have neither the knowledge nor the interest required to undertake something like that.)

            -- Bill

________________________________
From: Neil Soiffer <soiffer@alum.mit.edu>
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2023 8:48 PM
To: www-math@w3.org <www-math@w3.org>
Subject: Minutes: MathML TPAC meeting, 14 Sept, 2023

<https://sandbox.cryptpad.info/code/inner.html?ver=5.4.1#cp-md-0-agenda>
. . .


NS: asked SD where SD wants to go with MathML 5 because he has a content-MathML based editor.


SD found that MathML content works better than presentation MathML for SD's Braille equation editor.

. . .