- From: Deyan Ginev <deyan.ginev@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 19:11:36 -0500
- To: Neil Soiffer <soiffer@alum.mit.edu>
- Cc: "www-math@w3.org" <www-math@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANjPgh8itcEA=gjUeUOwKH3Dzh8BvGo2ciRb9GGUPhu_YFdhUw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Neil, Thank you for bringing the aria-labelsynonyms attribute to our attention, it was the first time I learned of its proposal. Two notes come to mind: 1. my "alias" suggestion had the additional benefit of it being a one-time global annotation (in the Open and possibly Core lists), rather than being locally generated on every <math> element that may need it. 2. I don't really understand the aesthetics of half-dashed naming schemes. "aria-label-synonyms" feels much cleaner/legible than "aria-labelsynonyms". I assume that is some internal consistency ARIA is maintaining, considering e.g. "aria-brailleroledescription" suffers the same legibility deficit. For readers not familiar with the "alias" discussion, the issue is at https://github.com/w3c/mathml-docs/issues/40 Greetings, Deyan On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 6:50 PM Neil Soiffer <soiffer@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > The ARIA WG is considering adding aria-labelsynonyms > <https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/1038>. I won't pretend to understand > the subtleties. The gist is that for speech-to-text (not text-to-speech), > adding synonyms makes it more likely that something will be found. There is > a little bit of an analogy with Deyan's goal of adding aliases for intent > names. Perhaps others will not feel there is much analogy or maybe someone > will find a strong similarity. Given the potential similarities, I felt > people should be aware of it. > > Neil > > >
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2023 00:12:16 UTC