- From: Deyan Ginev <deyan.ginev@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2023 22:54:17 -0400
- To: Stephen Watt <smwatt@gmail.com>
- Cc: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>, "www-math@w3.org" <www-math@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANjPgh8cRMQmJJfdJKzrhjTgc4tJSG9Yx6p+Ag0SrkNtzSPW5g@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, This document is a very curious time capsule, thank you for sharing. It is amusing that some comments sound like our design discussions on Intent. I enjoyed: "The compositor should not be satisfied with attaining only mathematical accuracy, but should strive for an elegant and easily read arrangement. Even when a good deal of time can be devoted to copy preparation it is not wise to give the compositor too many instructions which may confuse rather than assist. A simple code of copy-marking must be used to avoid mistakes." --- The classic factorial notation on page 31 was of particular note to me, quite surprising! It seems to be border-based, and may be beyond the usual Presentation MathML terrain of expressivity? I gave it a try with some CSS + Intent, and it worked out nicely in Chrome (and OK in Firefox): https://codepen.io/dginev/pen/oNQOjLv Deyan P.S. I also stumbled on a more in-depth exploration of that forgotten factorial notation, for others who may be curious: https://kconrad.math.uconn.edu/factorials/ On Sat, Aug 5, 2023 at 6:30 PM Stephen Watt <smwatt@gmail.com> wrote: > David, > > Thank you for sharing the mr_40_4 link. That was a delightful read. > > Stephen > > On Sat, Aug 5, 2023 at 6:23 PM David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote: > >> >> > An attempt has been made to name all the mathematical signs that > have >> been cut by the Monotype Corporation. It is obvious that this can > be only >> partially successful, firstly because there is a continuous > influx of new >> signs and secondly because signs are not always used > for the same >> purpose. In more advanced mathematics it would be > necessary to know the >> context in order to identify the exact meaning > of the sign. >> >> >> You may think this is a good description of intent from >> >> https://w3c.github.io/mathml/#mixing_intent >> >> >> But it is a quote from the Editorial note of this interesting manuscript >> from the Monotype Corporation, first published in 1956 >> >> https://www.metaltype.co.uk/downloads/mr/mr_40_4.pdf >> >> Some things never change... >> >> David >> >> Thanks to Barbara Beeton for the link >> >> >> >> *Disclaimer* >> >> The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and >> Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: 30 St. Giles, >> Oxford, OX1 3LE, United Kingdom. Please see our Privacy Notice >> <https://www.nag.com/content/privacy-notice>for information on how we >> process personal data and for details of how to stop or limit >> communications from us. >> >> This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses and malware by Microsoft >> Exchange Online (EOP) >> >
Received on Monday, 7 August 2023 02:54:49 UTC