- From: Neil Soiffer <soiffer@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 01:35:19 -0700
- To: Dave Barton <dbarton@mathscribe.com>
- Cc: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>, www-math@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAESRWkCgwcRXwODq8cwUX7sb+sLdmju-Crbo00X0nBK67qe21g@mail.gmail.com>
Dave, Thanks for the reference. According to the chromium issue, Google is aware of this issue and has a long term plan to change how rendering works so the rendering will be correct. I suspect "long term" means "not this year." :-( I just tried the example from the referenced stackoverflow link in Chrome 112.0.5615.138 and the brackets look good. Here's my codepen example <https://codepen.io/nms/pen/xxyqZPo>. Are you seeing a problem in Chrome with this example? In the bug report, I don't see mention of it being fixed so I don't know why it is working for me in 112. Neil On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 2:04 PM Dave Barton <dbarton@mathscribe.com> wrote: > I think the most important issue is still large (stretchy) brackets. This > has been the fundamental architectural issue for MathML layout in browsers > for literally decades. For current bug reports, see: > > https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1415218 > > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/75621629/issue-with-mathml-rendering-of-matrix-like-formulas-in-chrome-for-both-on-mac-an > > If you're going to discuss bugs in your agenda, I suggest you include this > one. I doubt serious authors will use MathML on the web until there's a > plan to fix this, IMHO. Also fixing it requires more discussion with > browser vendors (especially google) than simple MathML bugs do. > > Respectfully, Dave B. > On 4/21/23 11:36 AM, Brian Kardell wrote: > > Agenda started at https://github.com/w3c/mathml-core/issues/192 > > Add what you like, see you then! > > > -- > Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: bkardell.com > >
Received on Monday, 24 April 2023 08:35:33 UTC