- From: Neil Soiffer <soiffer@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 01:35:19 -0700
- To: Dave Barton <dbarton@mathscribe.com>
- Cc: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>, www-math@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAESRWkCgwcRXwODq8cwUX7sb+sLdmju-Crbo00X0nBK67qe21g@mail.gmail.com>
Dave,
Thanks for the reference. According to the chromium issue, Google is aware
of this issue and has a long term plan to change how rendering works so the
rendering will be correct. I suspect "long term" means "not this year." :-(
I just tried the example from the referenced stackoverflow link in Chrome
112.0.5615.138 and the brackets look good. Here's my codepen example
<https://codepen.io/nms/pen/xxyqZPo>. Are you seeing a problem in Chrome
with this example? In the bug report, I don't see mention of it being fixed
so I don't know why it is working for me in 112.
Neil
On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 2:04 PM Dave Barton <dbarton@mathscribe.com> wrote:
> I think the most important issue is still large (stretchy) brackets. This
> has been the fundamental architectural issue for MathML layout in browsers
> for literally decades. For current bug reports, see:
>
> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1415218
>
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/75621629/issue-with-mathml-rendering-of-matrix-like-formulas-in-chrome-for-both-on-mac-an
>
> If you're going to discuss bugs in your agenda, I suggest you include this
> one. I doubt serious authors will use MathML on the web until there's a
> plan to fix this, IMHO. Also fixing it requires more discussion with
> browser vendors (especially google) than simple MathML bugs do.
>
> Respectfully, Dave B.
> On 4/21/23 11:36 AM, Brian Kardell wrote:
>
> Agenda started at https://github.com/w3c/mathml-core/issues/192
>
> Add what you like, see you then!
>
>
> --
> Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: bkardell.com
>
>
Received on Monday, 24 April 2023 08:35:33 UTC