Re: Reminder: MathML Full meeting on Thursday (2 hours)

Regrets, once again. I'll be out of the office on vacation the rest of the week.

--Steve




Steve Noble
Principal Researcher, Accessibility
Psychometrics & Testing Services

Pearson

502 969 3088
steve.noble@pearson.com<mailto:steve.noble@pearson.com>

[https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/xFjftXlwMzpdFeTtDgc4_IwyMYm8ThtQHIsgElkS8fyiCO2M7ZM0WaO7r2uy-bmKAe5S2sIcg7d-mwbD4ArkJhyafHke-SgJ2ui8DoGoBhZw4YIyWeK3LUozNMwBff4JR2tdu8nZ2fvoNvkkA06KNw9-s3P9UvYsHSTphHss6X0=s0-d-e1-ft#http://accessibility4school.pearson.com/access/4c49fe02-e204-46b4-b6f0-82f5a3f159cb/pearson-accessibility.jpg]

[NSF's Convergence Accelerator - 2022 Cohort Member]<https://beta.nsf.gov/funding/initiatives/convergence-accelerator>


________________________________
From: Neil Soiffer <soiffer@alum.mit.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2023 6:35 PM
To: www-math@w3.org <www-math@w3.org>
Subject: Reminder: MathML Full meeting on Thursday (2 hours)

We meet at: 10am Pacific, 1pm Eastern, 6pm GMT, 7pm Central European Time.

The meeting details were sent to the W3C members-only "member-math" mailing list<https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-math/2021May/0000.html> for the group. The regulars for this group should have the meeting details in their calendars.

This will be another extended 2 hour meeting so we can get through some important discussions involving "intent". I think this will be our last extended meeting for a while.

Agenda
1. Announcements/Updates/Progress reports
    Anything that can be closed?
2. Intent issues this week:
   a) Do the # of arguments define a core "intent"?<https://github.com/w3c/mathml/issues/435> #435
   b) Some specific intent examples <https://github.com/w3c/mathml/issues/456#top> #456 (turned into function vs property discussion)
3. Proposed spec changes:
   a)  "_" as a function head needs specification <https://github.com/w3c/mathml/issues/457#top> #457
   b) Deyan's PR:  IntentName view of literals<https://github.com/w3c/mathml/pull/459> #459
3. Stepping back: is "intent" usage clear yet? If not, what are the major questions/disagreements?