- From: Neil Soiffer <soiffer@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 08:23:26 -0700
- To: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
- Cc: www-math@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAESRWkC=8VNci6vGhhDdmvFJxBaz3a2maywu6mHmHJ0N-rqKdA@mail.gmail.com>
Bert, Thanks for mentioning the option. At some point we will likely take that up. However, at this point in time, we are a long way from being ready to do the switch. "intent" needs lots of work. Right now, it is basically a strawman so that others can look at it, comment on it, and experiment with it. Getting to FPWD makes it a little more likely that those outside the Math WG will take a look at it and provide feedback. Neil On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 8:58 AM Bert Bos <bert@w3.org> wrote: > Not urgent, but we should discuss some day when we want the generic > MathML link https://www.w3.org/TR/mathml to point to MathML version 4 > instead of version 3. > > Traditionally, the generic link for a specification points to the latest > Recommendation, but that is not a requirement anymore. It can point to > the specification that the WG considers the "most relevant" (most > stable, most useful...) > > We can wait until MathML4 is a Candidate Recommendation, or maybe there > will be a draft that we consider "better" than MathML3 even before that. > > > > Bert > -- > Bert Bos ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/ > http://www.w3.org/people/bos W3C/ERCIM > bert@w3.org 2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93 > +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France >
Received on Monday, 12 September 2022 15:23:52 UTC