- From: Neil Soiffer <soiffer@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 08:23:26 -0700
- To: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
- Cc: www-math@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAESRWkC=8VNci6vGhhDdmvFJxBaz3a2maywu6mHmHJ0N-rqKdA@mail.gmail.com>
Bert,
Thanks for mentioning the option. At some point we will likely take that
up. However, at this point in time, we are a long way from being ready to
do the switch. "intent" needs lots of work. Right now, it is basically a
strawman so that others can look at it, comment on it, and experiment with
it. Getting to FPWD makes it a little more likely that those outside the
Math WG will take a look at it and provide feedback.
Neil
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 8:58 AM Bert Bos <bert@w3.org> wrote:
> Not urgent, but we should discuss some day when we want the generic
> MathML link https://www.w3.org/TR/mathml to point to MathML version 4
> instead of version 3.
>
> Traditionally, the generic link for a specification points to the latest
> Recommendation, but that is not a requirement anymore. It can point to
> the specification that the WG considers the "most relevant" (most
> stable, most useful...)
>
> We can wait until MathML4 is a Candidate Recommendation, or maybe there
> will be a draft that we consider "better" than MathML3 even before that.
>
>
>
> Bert
> --
> Bert Bos ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/
> http://www.w3.org/people/bos W3C/ERCIM
> bert@w3.org 2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93
> +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
>
Received on Monday, 12 September 2022 15:23:52 UTC