- From: Deyan Ginev <deyan.ginev@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 19:25:40 -0500
- To: Neil Soiffer <soiffer@alum.mit.edu>
- Cc: "www-math@w3.org" <www-math@w3.org>
Are you looking for literals nested inside a longer value? And why "speech-oriented" - does that imply they have no reasonable semantic counterpart? (Such as my "blob" example for the group operator cdot). The "awkward nesting (2)" example in the tiny showcase is a decent stress-test I think: https://dginev.github.io/tiny-mathml-a11y-demo/ <msub intent="median(index($1,$2))"> <mover accent="true"> <mi arg="1">x</mi> <mo>¯</mo> </mover> <mi arg="2">i</mi> </msub> Greetings, Deyan On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 7:13 PM Neil Soiffer <soiffer@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > > In looking at a few of the discussion papers, I only found one example of a literal in the intent: > \int \fraction{dr}{r} > intent="$op(divide(1,$r),$bvar) > > This example comes from a time where we were trying to be content-oriented in our approach, something we've agreed is not always good for speech/AT. These days I don't think we would do anything special with the fraction or the integral because it just wants to be read something like "integral of fraction d r over r end fraction" > > Does someone have a speech-oriented example of using a literal? I am trying to architect how I will do the intent implementation in MathCAT and want to make sure I accommodate that case. > > Thanks, > > Neil >
Received on Friday, 17 December 2021 00:26:19 UTC