- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2018 23:17:27 +0000
- To: "www-math@w3.org" <www-math@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <0c5bb118-0fc2-5170-b047-e20ca248feee@nag.co.uk>
On 04/11/2018 17:04, William F Hammond wrote: > David Carlisle in part: > >> Syntax to be determined but something in the style of the existing >> <surrogate mathvariant="bold" ref="U00041"/> >> which maps the "holes" in the math alphabet blocks to the equivalent >> bmp character. > > The holes in the math alphabet blocks represent missing *characters* > in those blocks. There are no equivalent BMP *characters*, so one is > just borrowing *glyphs* from sporadic BMP characters, each of which arose > earlier in the history of unicode for one or more special intentions. > > -- Bill > > yes I know, I just meant add a similar cross reference element in unicode.xml, not that the specific details of the characters were the same. David Disclaimer The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in Software as a Service (SaaS) for business.
Received on Sunday, 4 November 2018 23:18:01 UTC