- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 13:46:17 +0000
- To: www-math@w3.org
- Message-ID: <46143ced-952d-eb09-8d17-dcfb2d3fffc3@nag.co.uk>
On 23/03/2018 13:38, Frédéric WANG wrote: > >> >> Yes we should say something (as it happens TeX also has difficulties >> with combining characters) >> >> somewhere around >> >> https://w3c.github.io/mathml/chapter7.html#chars.comb-chars >> >> I guess is the place to add something. >> >> As you hint I may need to add some extra data to unicode.xml to specify >> which characters are related in this way, I don't think the existing >> Unicode data reliably says which are equivalent combining/non combining >> forms although obviously taking the character name and deleting >> "Combining" gives a first approximation of the mapping. >> >> >> David > > Hi David, > > Indeed, I would prefer an explicit list for better interoperability. Are > you able to come up with one list, maybe doing the change in the repo of > unicode.xml? For you information, below are the available horizontal > stretchy constructions available in some popular OpenType MATH fonts. I > believe other fonts also only provide constructions for combining > versions of accents. > > ... I'll see what I can do..... David Disclaimer The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in Software as a Service (SaaS) for business.
Received on Friday, 23 March 2018 13:46:48 UTC