- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 23:12:53 +0100
- To: <www-math@w3.org>
On 26/07/2016 20:11, Daniel Marques wrote: > I also like the "mfenced". Vertical stretchies with <mo> are difficult to > understand from the point of view of someone who uses a formula editor. > What people understands when editing is that an open and close parenthesis > grows according to what's inside. Thus, for people who do editors, the > preferred feature is the mfenced. > > There is also a VERY important aspect which is BACKWARD COMPATIBILITY. > There are plenty of formulas that use mfenced. Both Microsoft Word and > WIRIS (I'm not able to test MathType at this moment) use the mfenced tag > for stretchy parenthesis. > > Losing backward compatibility will result that a lot of formulas stop > working. This would yield a lack of trust on the MathML specification. > Please do not commit that mistake! > > Dani > > I don't think we should remove (or even deprecate) anything but if there are features that can be omitted from a profile that makes it easier to get mathml into browsers I'm certainly open to discuss that. especially cases that could easily be polyfilled with some lightweight javascript as for mfenced->mrow conversion. If the alternative is not a "full" mathml3 implementation but rather no native implementation at all, and having to implement the entire rendering in javacript then some subset profile should I think be considered even if it complicates the story on compatibility. I think the question is what's the minimum that need to be added to a browser's core rendering code that enables a useful subset of mathml to be rendered directly and the rest via some (relatively) simple javascript support. Anyway I encourage Frédéric to keep posting suggestions, certainly there's no rush to standardise anything at this stage, but keeping track of what works in practice across webkit and gecko (and hopefully one day blink and edge) and specifying that at some point, even if that is a subset of "full" mathml would I think be a useful exercise. David ________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Microsoft Office 365. ________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2016 22:13:29 UTC