- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 17:25:16 +0000
- To: <www-math@w3.org>
On 08/02/2016 15:37, Frédéric WANG wrote: > Dear all, > > The MathML recommendation refers to > http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U1EE00.pdf which contains two Arabic > operators (U+1EEF0 and U+1EEF1). Note that these operators are stretchy. > > They are not mentioned on > https://www.w3.org/Math/draft-spec/appendixc.html. Actually, the > unicode.xml file from https://www.w3.org/TR/xml-entity-names/ does not > have any operator-dictionary or unicode-math entry either. > > See also: > https://github.com/wspr/unicode-math/pull/320 > https://github.com/khaledhosny/xits-math/issues/45 > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1246657 > https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153984 > Thanks for the reminder, I saw Khaled's pull request to unicode-math last year and remember thinking at the time that unicode.xml would need updating to match. I can add the latex name information to match unicode-math and a operator-dictionary stretchy=true entry but if any of the other operator-dictionary fields should have values I'd need some help with what the values should be! David ________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Microsoft Office 365. ________________________________
Received on Monday, 8 February 2016 17:25:57 UTC