W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-math@w3.org > February 2016

Re: Arabic operators U+1EEF0 and U+1EEF1

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 17:25:16 +0000
To: <www-math@w3.org>
Message-ID: <56B8CF7C.8050004@nag.co.uk>
On 08/02/2016 15:37, Frédéric WANG wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> The MathML recommendation refers to
> http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U1EE00.pdf which contains two Arabic
> operators (U+1EEF0 and U+1EEF1). Note that these operators are stretchy.
>
> They are not mentioned on
> https://www.w3.org/Math/draft-spec/appendixc.html. Actually, the
> unicode.xml file from https://www.w3.org/TR/xml-entity-names/ does not
> have any operator-dictionary or unicode-math entry either.
>
> See also:
> https://github.com/wspr/unicode-math/pull/320
> https://github.com/khaledhosny/xits-math/issues/45
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1246657
> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153984
>

Thanks for the reminder, I saw Khaled's pull request to unicode-math
last year and remember thinking at the time that unicode.xml would need
updating to match.

I can add the latex name information to match unicode-math and a
operator-dictionary stretchy=true
entry but if any of the other operator-dictionary fields should have
values I'd need some help with what the values should be!

David


________________________________


The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:

Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.



This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Microsoft Office 365.

________________________________
Received on Monday, 8 February 2016 17:25:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 8 February 2016 17:25:58 UTC