- From: Frédéric WANG <fred.wang@free.fr>
- Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 13:31:26 +0100
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- CC: "www-math@w3.org" <www-math@w3.org>
Le 06/01/2014 13:09, David Carlisle a écrit : > unicode.xml already has entries for lim/max/min they just don't have > operator dictionary fields, they could be added if the working group > agrees.... Here are the commands in itex2MML that are "MI" (normal mi) and "MIB" (mi with 'movablelimits'): http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/~distler/code/itexToMML/view/head:/itex-src/itex2MML.l#L210 There is a potential issue that the <mi> / <mo> use will be inconsistent and that many new operators will be necessary (or the generators would have to set the lspace/rspace explicitly). I think MathJax used to generate <mo> for "sin", "cos" etc but this was changed to an <mi> when an explicit "Apply Function" was added: <math><mi>sin</mi><mo>⁡</mo><mi>x</mi></math> (Having <mo>sin</mo><mo>⁡</mo><mi>x</mi> won't make much sense...) So the question is really if "max" is a function like \sin or a prefix operator like \sum... -- Frédéric Wang MathML Crowdfunding: ulule.com/mathematics-ebooks
Received on Monday, 6 January 2014 12:31:55 UTC