Re: Arabic Mathematical Alphabetic Symbols

I think the reference would be a good idea.


On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 4:27 AM, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote:

> On 29/09/2013 01:48, David Carlisle wrote:
>
>> On 28/09/2013 18:43, Frédéric WANG wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> should mention the arabic block, I think. Should probably be done at
>>> other places too.
>>>
>>
>> I added reference in the main place
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/Math/draft-**spec/chapter3-d.html#presm.**commatt<http://www.w3.org/Math/draft-spec/chapter3-d.html#presm.commatt>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> The editors draft of the entities spec has been updated some time ago
> to Unicode 6.x and lists these characters by mathvariabnt so
>
> double-struck is extended
>
> http://www.w3.org/2003/**entities/2007doc/double-**struck.html<http://www.w3.org/2003/entities/2007doc/double-struck.html>
>
> initial
>
> http://www.w3.org/2003/**entities/2007doc/initial.html<http://www.w3.org/2003/entities/2007doc/initial.html>
>
> tailed
>
> http://www.w3.org/2003/**entities/2007doc/tailed.html<http://www.w3.org/2003/entities/2007doc/tailed.html>
>
> looped
>
> http://www.w3.org/2003/**entities/2007doc/looped.html<http://www.w3.org/2003/entities/2007doc/looped.html>
>
> stretched
>
> http://www.w3.org/2003/**entities/2007doc/stretched.**html<http://www.w3.org/2003/entities/2007doc/stretched.html>
>
> Perhaps we should reference these in chapter 3 as they provide a direct
> table of the correspondence between the BMP character and mathvariant and
> the character in the 1EE00 block. That would probably mean submitting the
> entities spec to a revised REC at the same time as MathML.
>
> David
>
>
>
>
>