Re: Fwd: [mathjax-dev] Requesting feedback about usefulness of MathML

There's a great deal of ignorance in that thread and (incorrect)
generalizations about other ML (including CML). MLs are making progress -
it just seems that the timeline is slower that many of us thought in 1994.

P..


On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:51 AM, William F Hammond <hammond@csc.albany.edu>wrote:

> Frédéric WANG <fred.wang@free.fr> writes:
>
> > Forwarding this message to relevant mailing lists.
> >
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject:      [mathjax-dev] Requesting feedback about usefulness of
> MathML
> > Date:         Sun, 5 May 2013 10:18:39 -0700 (PDT)
> > From:         Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@gmail.com>
> > Reply-To:     mathjax-dev@googlegroups.com
> > To:   mathjax-dev@googlegroups.com
> >
> > Dear MathJax community:
> >
> > There is a conversation at the moment on a Mozilla mailing list
> > regarding the usefulness of MathML:
> >
> >
> http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.platform/browse_thread/thread/f7a759c358d74ef3#
> >
>
>
> Rather disappointing if not alarming.
>
> It seems to be a long list of reasons by a Mozilla developer in
> support of the proposition that Mozilla should discontinue its native
> support for MathML.
>
> The cited url failed for me.  But go to
> http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.platform/
> and look for the thread (more than 50 posts) -- that I don't
> have time to read now.
>
>                                      -- Bill
>
>
>


-- 
Peter Murray-Rust
Reader in Molecular Informatics
Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
University of Cambridge
CB2 1EW, UK
+44-1223-763069