- From: Paul Libbrecht <paul@hoplahup.net>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:17:29 +0100
- To: Christian Lerch <christian.lerch@km-works.eu>
- Cc: www-math@w3.org, max@lapin-bleu.net
Max, Christian is right in that coverage is not complete. It's slightly bigger than the Safari test I reported a few months ago in the test-suite results and it starts to become really useful. Because MathML for webkit is mostly community work, It is now time, I think, that users make sure tat they report their desired missing features. 100% coverage is not something to require now, but useful coverage is. For an amount of elementary level textbooks, this works I believe. I think it's useful if we give it a shot on our published collections and report a recommendation or lack thereof. For example, I've heard a developer ActiveMath say that one single bug with limits and sums is blocking the adoption for them (the term variable is missing). That person should open a bug at bus.webkit.org, I think. Christian, do you have a bug about stretchiness? Paul Le 18 janv. 2013 à 10:19, Christian Lerch a écrit : > Well, except that integrals and over/under braces (still?) dont stretch ... > > Am 18.01.2013 09:30, schrieb Max Froumentin: >> I don't think I've seen this news mentioned on the list: >> >> http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/Stable-Chrome-24-supports-MathML-and-closes-security-holes-1781648.html >> >> A quick look on the torture tests of the test suite leads to believe >> the implementation is complete and renders MathML correctly. >> >> Max. >> >> > >
Received on Friday, 18 January 2013 10:18:02 UTC