- From: Tom Leathrum <leathrum@jsu.edu>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:10:18 -0600 (CST)
- To: Paul Topping <pault@dessci.com>
- Cc: Neil Soiffer <neils@dessci.com>, Kent Karlsson <kent.karlsson14@telia.com>, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>, Daniel Marques <dani@wiris.com>, www-math@w3.org, Murray Sargent <murrays@exchange.microsoft.com>, Khaled Hosny <khaledhosny@eglug.org>
If I may interject here: Paul, I think Murray's point about semantics addresses your concern, because if there is a semantic difference between reversed symbols in LTR then they will be represented in different Unicode values. Consider for example U+2282 "subset" and U+2283 "superset" -- the glyphs are mirror-images, and both are marked as mirror="Y" for RTL. RTL would have the visual effect of swapping these two glyphs, but in fact their Unicode values wouldn't change because the semantics would still be the same -- U+2282 would be semantically "subset" whether it is mirrored or not, and in RTL the glyph for it would look (to LTR readers) like a superset symbol. Clear as mud? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Topping" <pault@dessci.com> To: "Murray Sargent" <murrays@exchange.microsoft.com>, "Khaled Hosny" <khaledhosny@eglug.org> Cc: "Neil Soiffer" <neils@dessci.com>, "Kent Karlsson" <kent.karlsson14@telia.com>, "David Carlisle" <davidc@nag.co.uk>, "Daniel Marques" <dani@wiris.com>, www-math@w3.org Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 1:46:15 PM Subject: RE: Mirroring Unicode symbols in Arabian So this means that reversing a symbol to express a mathematical concept is unavailable to non-RTL text even though the fonts and the font rendering mechanism has the capability. Paul > -----Original Message----- > From: Murray Sargent [mailto:murrays@exchange.microsoft.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 11:36 AM > To: Paul Topping; Khaled Hosny > Cc: Neil Soiffer; Kent Karlsson; David Carlisle; Daniel Marques; www- > math@w3.org > Subject: RE: Mirroring Unicode symbols in Arabian > > I meant that the codes for the mirrored integral, etc., are exactly the > same as the unmirrored symbols. The display software just mirrors them > in RTL math zones. If you use OpenType, you used the 'rtlm' feature or > shaping, as the characters warrant. This is the same thing as for > mirrored characters that have mirrored character counterparts. An open > paren is U+0028 whether it's mirrored or not. > > Murray > > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Topping [mailto:pault@dessci.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 11:31 AM > To: Murray Sargent; Khaled Hosny > Cc: Neil Soiffer; Kent Karlsson; David Carlisle; Daniel Marques; www- > math@w3.org > Subject: RE: Mirroring Unicode symbols in Arabian > > Not sure how this answers my question. > > Paul > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Murray Sargent [mailto:murrays@exchange.microsoft.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 11:24 AM > > To: Paul Topping; Khaled Hosny > > Cc: Neil Soiffer; Kent Karlsson; David Carlisle; Daniel Marques; www- > > math@w3.org > > Subject: RE: Mirroring Unicode symbols in Arabian > > > > Mirrored glyphs are a display feature, not a semantic one. > > > > Murray > > > > Paul Topping asked, "If access to these characters requires use of > > this OpenType feature, does it imply that such characters will not be > > accessible from applications that simply process Unicode text strings > > (eg, web browsers and most other apps)?"
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 20:10:47 UTC