- From: Ionel Alexandru <ionel.alexandru@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:43:45 -0500
- To: William F Hammond <hammond@csc.albany.edu>
- Cc: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>, www-math@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAH_je0c1622FGqs5gwweWdxNiAeXeSS6g4u2AAemmk-+dWOhSg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, thank you, But what would be the rendering if I have (default mathsize=25). <mrow> <mtext>An example: </mtext> <mi mathsize="50">aaa</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mfrac><mn>1</mn><mn>2</mn></mfrac> <mi>aaa</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mfrac><msup><mi>A</mi><mi>A</mi></msup><mi>b</mi></mfrac> </mrow> How would be displayed "aaa" ? Centered ? It seems better to be aligned to baseline both texts like: An example: aaa thank you for your time Ionel Alexandru www.fmath.info On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 2:32 PM, William F Hammond <hammond@csc.albany.edu>wrote: > David Carlisle writes in part: > > > I attach the rendering of firefox and mathplayer with the following > > example, which shows fractions of different sizes aligning such that > > their bars match that of + (which is also what TeX would do). > > > > ... > > > > <!DOCTYPE html> > > <html> > > <title>test</title> > > <body> > > <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> > > <mrow> > > <mtext>aaa</mtext> > > <mo>+</mo> > > <mfrac><mn>1</mn><mn>2</mn></mfrac> > > <mtext>aaa</mtext> > > <mo>+</mo> > > <mfrac><msup><mi>A</mi><mi>A</mi></msup><mi>b</mi></mfrac> > > </mrow> > > </math> > > </body> > > </html> > > Of course, the semantics are not defined, but, relative to default > semantics, you've used mtext where I think it would have been better > to use mi (without, for correct user agents, changing the rendered > appearance). Thus, the mrow might be: > > <mrow> > <mtext>An example: </mtext> > <mi>aaa</mi> > <mo>+</mo> > <mfrac><mn>1</mn><mn>2</mn></mfrac> > <mi>aaa</mi> > <mo>+</mo> > <mfrac><msup><mi>A</mi><mi>A</mi></msup><mi>b</mi></mfrac> > </mrow> > > > -- Bill > >
Received on Monday, 18 February 2013 20:44:14 UTC