- From: Neil Soiffer <NeilS@dessci.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 09:08:22 -0700
- To: Frédéric WANG <fred.wang@free.fr>
- Cc: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>, "www-math@w3.org" <www-math@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BANLkTikGxLepWT-Bf6DCyDCQ8r5Kpp1=3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Expanding on David's response: you shouldn't use the combining chars as part of an mi or other token for *markup*. Eg, the following is wrong: <mi> x⃛</mi> However, it is OK to use them as part of xxxscript notations when there aren't alternative chars available. So, this is OK: <mover> <mi>x</mi> <mo>⃛</mo> </mover> It is helpful if your renderer accepts all of the combining chars as part of a xxxscript as there are plenty of MathML authoring tools out in the world that will generate markup that uses them. Neil Soiffer Senior Scientist Design Science, Inc. www.dessci.com ~ Makers of MathType, MathFlow, MathPlayer, MathDaisy, Equation Editor ~ 2011/5/16 Frédéric WANG <fred.wang@free.fr> > Le 16/05/2011 12:40, David Carlisle a écrit : > > On 16/05/2011 10:48, Frédéric WANG wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm wondering what characters to use for triple and quadruple dots. The > MathML dictionary contains > > 'COMBINING THREE DOTS ABOVE' (U+20DB) > and > 'COMBINING FOUR DOTS ABOVE' (U+20DC) > > but the > > http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML/chapter7.html#chars.comb-chars > > says COMBINING characters should not be used. > > > well combining characters should be avoided where possible, but in (I > think) three cases I couldn't see an alternative, and Unicode hasn't added > non combining versions, so I think here the markup has to use > the codepoints for the combining characters. > > David > > OK, thanks. > > -- > Frédéric Wang. > Website <http://www.maths-informatique-jeux.com/> - Weblog<http://www.maths-informatique-jeux.com/blog/frederic/> >
Received on Monday, 16 May 2011 16:08:51 UTC