- From: Frédéric WANG <fred.wang@free.fr>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:35:45 +0200
- To: neils@dessci.com
- CC: Neil Soiffer <neil.soiffer@gmail.com>, "www-math@w3.org" <www-math@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4C10CE11.5080802@free.fr>
Thanks, it looks good (there is just a typo elment => element in paragraph 3.2.5.7.2). BTW, I wrote a script some months ago to compare Mozilla operator dictionary against the one suggested in appendix C. Unfortunately, it no longer works because the structure of the HTML table in appendixc.html has changed. I wonder if this table of operators is generated from something easier to parse and with a more stable format, for example an XML file? If so, would it be possible to make it public? This would make it more convenient for implementers who want to align on the W3C's dictionary. On 03/06/2010 07:55, Neil Soiffer wrote: > I forgot to send a response, but several weeks back we made changes to > chapter 3 and fixed up the operator dictionary somewhat that are along > the lines you suggested. Take a look at: > http://monet.nag.co.uk/~dpc/draft-spec/chapter3-d.html#id.3.2.5.7 > <http://monet.nag.co.uk/%7Edpc/draft-spec/chapter3-d.html#id.3.2.5.7> > > In particular, look at 3.2.5.7.2 Default value of the |form| attribute. > > There were lots of changes/improvements to the operator dictionary: > http://monet.nag.co.uk/~dpc/draft-spec/appendixc.html > <http://monet.nag.co.uk/%7Edpc/draft-spec/appendixc.html> > (the diff marked form of the operator dictionary was messed up when I > looked at it) > > I hope these seem reasonable to you, > > Neil Soiffer > Senior Scientist > Design Science, Inc. > www.dessci.com <http://www.dessci.com/> > ~ Makers of MathType, MathFlow, MathPlayer, MathDaisy, WebEQ, Equation > Editor ~ -- Frédéric Wang. Website <http://www.maths-informatique-jeux.com/> - Weblog <http://www.maths-informatique-jeux.com/blog/frederic/>
Received on Thursday, 10 June 2010 11:33:17 UTC