Re: Possible bug in the operator dictionary and mmlalias.ent?

> for completeness, since all of the other variants of greater and not
> greater have corresponding less than and not less than entities
> defined.

It's clear that this is "missing" in some sense, but we're taking a 
fairly hard line in not adding any new names.

If we add a name and someone uses it then any fragments of mathml using 
that that get moved to a document using an older dtd are not well formed 
and the xml parser would reject the entire document.

This is why for example thel doube struck letters only have entities for 
upper case not lower case, even though there are now defined unicode 
code points for upper and lower case


The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. 

Received on Thursday, 4 February 2010 15:48:03 UTC