Re: [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: Rich Web Clients Activity Proposal - Touch Interface Working Group'

Yes, the conclusion was that we can make editorial changes.  You should diff
mark them because we need to report them.

    Neil


On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Robert Miner <robertm@dessci.com> wrote:

>  Thanks for voting Mohamed!
>
> @David, Patrick,
>
> We have concluded we can just go ahead and make corrections like the ones
> Mohamed pointed out, right?
>
> Do we just update the cvs source as usual?  I can probably do it.
>
> --Robert
>
> ---------------------
>
> Additional comments about the specification:
>    Normative References
> * Update Bidi reference to 22 september 2009 (instead of 21 March 2008)
> * Please use ISO Relax NG reference ([RELAX NG] ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34.
> ISO/IEC 19757-2:2008(E) Document Schema Definition Language (DSDL) -- Part
> 2: Regular-grammar-based validation -- RELAX NG 2008.
>
> http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=52348
> )
> * For ISO10646 use this link
> http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=39921
> Non normatives
> * David Hyatt (with 2 T) is no more referenced as co-editor of HTML5
> * Might be good to reference to Proposed REC version of MathMLforCSS
> * Modularization has been updated to 1.1 in July 2010
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/
> * XLink has been updated to XLink 1.1 in May 2010
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xlink11/
>
>
>
>
>